Lord of the Rings series!?

For discussion of Amazon's new television show "The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power"
Post Reply
User avatar
Frelga
Meanwhile...
Posts: 22479
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Home, where else

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Frelga »

I finally finished it today. It was excellent TV, and arguably the best Tolkien adaptation to date, taking into account the amount of invention the show required. I would rate it above PJ-LOTR, especially since he had the entire work right there to adapt and still invented a lot of things that did not need to be invented.

It makes a lot of choices I wouldn't have made, but at no point did I feel tempted to throw things at the TV.

It certainly takes the prize for how far it exceeded my admittedly low expectations.

OK, now I can go see what y'all have been posting all this time.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.

Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46101
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Glad to hear that you liked it, Frelga!
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
RoseMorninStar
Posts: 12882
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
Location: North Shire

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by RoseMorninStar »

I haven't watched it in it's entirety either, I'm glad to hear you liked it. Not wanting to throw things at the TV sounds like fairly high praise from you Frelga. :rofl:
My heart is forever in the Shire.
User avatar
elengil
Cat-egorical Herbitual Creativi-Tea
Posts: 6248
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Between the Mountains and the Sea

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by elengil »

I've seen enough clips to almost want to watch a few characters' scenes, but I don't have a Prime account and have no real interest in watching the actual show. But that is probably more because I have so little interest in "TV" in general than for any specific reason associated with the show.
The dumbest thing I've ever bought
was a 2020 planner.

"Does anyone ever think about Denethor, the guy driven to madness by staying up late into the night alone in the dark staring at a flickering device he believed revealed unvarnished truth about the outside word, but which in fact showed mostly manipulated media created by a hostile power committed to portraying nothing but bad news framed in the worst possible way in order to sap hope, courage, and the will to go on? Seems like he's someone we should think about." - Dave_LF
User avatar
Eldy
Drowning in Anadûnê
Posts: 1503
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 3:44 am
Location: Maryland, United States
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Eldy »

It's good to hear your take, Frelga! I'm glad you enjoyed it. Having low expectations can definitely be helpful: that's probably the main reason I liked Amazon's Wheel of Time (that, and it comparing favorably to Netflix's Cowboy Bebop, which was released the same day and that I actually did expect to be decent). :P
User avatar
Eldy
Drowning in Anadûnê
Posts: 1503
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 3:44 am
Location: Maryland, United States
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Eldy »

Bret Devereaux, military historian and self-described "pedantic" commentator on the intersection of his field with speculative fiction (he's previously written extensively on the book and film versions of the Battle of Helm's Deep and the Siege of Gondor), weighs in on the worldbuilding of ROP:

https://acoup.blog/2022/12/16/collectio ... eels-flat/
Now before we get into the historical critique (because that is what we do here), I want to explain why I think this approach is valid for this sort of media. Rings of Power, after all, makes no claim to historical accuracy or realism (unlike Game of Thrones or Assassin’s Creed) and so cannot be faulted for failing to do something it never set out to do. Nevertheless, there is a failing here and I think that failing is in worldbuilding rather than historical accuracy. Speculative fiction – be it fantasy or science fiction – is a genre where a great deal of the weight is carried by the fictional world being constructed.

We want the fictional world to feel real or at least like it could be a real world, with internally consistent rules and clear lines of effect and consequence. In part that is because the deep, rich real-ishness, as it were, contributes to the sensation (be it joy or horror, depending on the work’s tone) of exploring and discovering a new fictional world and in part it is because a world that feels real and bounded by rules, the way our world is bounded by rules, makes the stakes of the story itself more engaging. The plausible link between causes and consequences, bound by those rules, is what encourages us to invest in characters and to care about their decisions and internal struggles.

One may easily contrast a story set in a world unbounded by rules of logical consequences, like a dream. Anything can happen in a dream, unrelated to what came before or after. Dreams can break their own rules and they can exist in unreal or surreal spaces. And they also, famously, make for extremely boring stories. Nothing is quite so tedious as having someone narrate a dream to you, because nothing in the dream actually matters for anything that comes before or after. Of course nothing in a fictional story necessarily matters in the real world, but nothing in a dream actually matters even in the dream world. Thus the consistency of the rules and the setting are essential for allowing the audience to engage their emotions with the characters and story because they make the events in the story matter by making them feel less arbitrary.
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46101
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

I got as far as "I think it is no great secret that Rings of Power broadly failed to live up to expectations and left a lot of audiences disappointed" and stopped reading.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Eldy
Drowning in Anadûnê
Posts: 1503
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 3:44 am
Location: Maryland, United States
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Eldy »

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
Frelga
Meanwhile...
Posts: 22479
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Home, where else

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Frelga »

I got a number of paragraphs farther than that, but he still hasn't said anything about the show and my attention span is not what it used to be.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.

Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
User avatar
Snowdog
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:08 am
Location: South Pole
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Snowdog »

I think this guy just likes to read his own typing, or 'hear himself talk'.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
--Bilbo Baggins
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46101
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Re: Lord of the Rings series!?

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Post Reply