Republicans have been arguing that Oz really just meant what the Supreme Court ruled: that each states should have the ability to legislate the status of abortion.N.E. Brigand wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 3:13 am John Fetterman struggled with some words tonight -- as he said would happen right at the top of the debate -- but he never said anything as ridiculous as Mehmet Oz's statement that the decision to have an abortion should be made by a woman, her doctor, and "local political leaders."
But setting aside how that allows states to decide that, for example, there should be no exception for rape or incest (something which Oz apparently believes but would never dare say directly), that's not what Oz said. He said:
"As a physician, I've been in the room when there's some difficult conversations happening. I don't want the federal government involved with that at all. I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that’s always allowed our nation to thrive, putting the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves."
He's talking about "difficult conversations" for which he, as a doctor, has been "in the room." He says that women and doctors should be part of that conversation. This is clearly in a medical setting, not in a legislative setting. So yes, the plain meaning of his words is that your mayor should be with you when you decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy.