The trilogy - remembered for what? By whom?
I posted on that TORC thread.
I was considerably annoyed by the claim that 'nobody cared about the LotR films' any more.
I spent a flippin' FORTUNE on those films.
And they gave me an awful lot.
I was considerably annoyed by the claim that 'nobody cared about the LotR films' any more.
I spent a flippin' FORTUNE on those films.
And they gave me an awful lot.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
So I guess we can all agree that the films were good to Tolkien in the long run, despite flaws... but still I think it's undeniable that some part of humanity
Short version: Why isn't TORC more active? Burnout of topics?
No one is denying that either, but I suggest let's discuss this bit more else we end up repeating ourselves too much.remembers the New Line films more for the general spectacle, the kewl battles and the merchandise than anything else.
The films have probably become a staple for blockbuster popcorn movie nights. But judging from the amount of TORC messageboard activity on the Tolkien-related subboards alone, most of those who jumped on the film bandwagon as a result of adolescent energy, at least, have moved on to other interests. And these young people comprise a large chunk of the films' target audience.I was considerably annoyed by the claim that 'nobody cared about the LotR films' any more.
Short version: Why isn't TORC more active? Burnout of topics?
I would question that quite strongly. The LotR movies are hardly your run-of-the-mill 'blockbuster popcorn movie'. They made Tolkien mainstream but they are still demanding: all very long, with a quite complicated story, and they have lots of characters speaking in an old-fashioned way. This is hardly bog-standard popcorn stuff.Anduril wrote:The films have probably become a staple for blockbuster popcorn movie nights.
And I can't think of a single fantasy film that has come close since. The first Narnia film did well, the lack of success of the second has pretty much put paid to the Narnia franchise -- -- and of course there's Harry Potter.
I would say that the Tolkien fandom is, on average, a more mature age than, say, the Harry Potter fandom.But judging from the amount of TORC messageboard activity on the Tolkien-related subboards alone, most of those who jumped on the film bandwagon as a result of adolescent energy, at least, have moved on to other interests. And these young people comprise a large chunk of the films' target audience.
I've had a number of young HP fans tell me that they tried to read LotR but found it 'boring'. Well, try it when you're older then! Sheesh. If you can read seven HP books, kiddo ...
Whenever I saw the LotR films in the UK (and I saw each of them about 12 times at least ) the audience would include all ages: huge swathes of middle-aged types as well as younger people.
Does it matter? All the LotR forums, not just TORC, are quieter these days. The films were a critical as well as a commercial success (RotK is the second highest grossing film of all time, after Titanic) but this was all five years ago. Of course people have moved on.Short version: Why isn't TORC more active? Burnout of topics?
As for The Hobbit, I am sure the forums will pick up as the film(s) get closer, but I don't think that TH engenders quite the same level as passion as LotR does.
I am unable to compare LotR fandom with other fandoms. Do Star Wars fans still discuss the films in the same numbers? The only other fandom I am involved in is Harry Potter, and of course that film franchise is ongoing. It's also worth mentioning that it is a much bigger fandom than LotR ever was.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
- sauronsfinger
- Posts: 3508
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am
Pearly Di - every time you post about the films you pretty much capture my own thoughts. That is comforting.
I would think the Star Wars fandom is a bit more numerous and active partly because the toys and spinoff books are such a major part of the genre. What have they had now ? 25 years of this stuff? I have a good friend who is into the SW toys and he has two of those ten foot by ten foot rental units crammed with stuff.
So it perpetuates itself to some degree.
I agree with you that HOBBIT will recharge the boards and fandom in general. I know many on these boards see a difference in Hobbit and LOTR but I do not think the public will. Its going to be big - very big.
I would think the Star Wars fandom is a bit more numerous and active partly because the toys and spinoff books are such a major part of the genre. What have they had now ? 25 years of this stuff? I have a good friend who is into the SW toys and he has two of those ten foot by ten foot rental units crammed with stuff.
So it perpetuates itself to some degree.
I agree with you that HOBBIT will recharge the boards and fandom in general. I know many on these boards see a difference in Hobbit and LOTR but I do not think the public will. Its going to be big - very big.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
From an adaptational POV, PJ's films can sometimes drive me crazy but I do really like the films for their own sake.sauronsfinger wrote:Pearly Di - every time you post about the films you pretty much capture my own thoughts. That is comforting.
Yes, of course.I would think the Star Wars fandom is a bit more numerous and active partly because the toys and spinoff books are such a major part of the genre. What have they had now ? 25 years of this stuff? I have a good friend who is into the SW toys and he has two of those ten foot by ten foot rental units crammed with stuff.
Again, you're right. Joe and Jane Public will be very psyched for The Hobbit movie.I agree with you that HOBBIT will recharge the boards and fandom in general. I know many on these boards see a difference in Hobbit and LOTR but I do not think the public will. Its going to be big - very big.
And, I think, so will the Tolkien fans.
With Del Toro at the helm, the film has the potential to be absolutely tremendous.
But next time round I will not be following any spoilers.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46253
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Bah humbug! I keep on meeting Harry Potter fans who tell me that they liked the LotR films, a lot, but their sibling/friend/whoever told them that the films were better than the books so they haven't bothered to read LotR.
They also find Frodo 'stupid' in RotK.
I tell them he wasn't portrayed as stupid in the book.
But when all is said and done, I actually couldn't care less that some people don't like Tolkien. It's no skin off my nose.
Not now I know there are thousands and thousands of people all over the world who do love the world he created.
And actually, I don't even mind that some people prefer the films to the books. It's not an offensive opinion to hold.
But it's always good to urge people to try the books.
I am a good ambassador for the Professor and his creation.
They also find Frodo 'stupid' in RotK.
I tell them he wasn't portrayed as stupid in the book.
But when all is said and done, I actually couldn't care less that some people don't like Tolkien. It's no skin off my nose.
Not now I know there are thousands and thousands of people all over the world who do love the world he created.
And actually, I don't even mind that some people prefer the films to the books. It's not an offensive opinion to hold.
But it's always good to urge people to try the books.
I am a good ambassador for the Professor and his creation.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Thought this ROTK quote was appropriate for film-only fans:
Aragorn: "It is but a shadow and a thought that you love."
Though this is overstating it.
(Is it from Walsh/Boyens or Tolkien?)
Aragorn: "It is but a shadow and a thought that you love."
Though this is overstating it.
(Is it from Walsh/Boyens or Tolkien?)
Last edited by Anduril on Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46253
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Actually, I would agree with that.Anduril wrote:Thought this ROTK quote was appropriate for film-only fans:
Aragorn: "It is but a shadow and a thought that you love."
Though this is overstating it.
And it's both movieverse and bookverse.
In the film, Aragorn says it to Éowyn (insensitive clot. :p)
In the book, he says it to Éomer: he is talking about Éowyn (as she lies in the Houses of Healing).
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Di wrote:
You expressed my feelings perfectly. They really did exceed expectations, on the whole, and could have been so much worse - Boorman, anyone?
sf wrote:
From an adaptational POV, PJ's films can sometimes drive me crazy but I do really like the films for their own sake.
You expressed my feelings perfectly. They really did exceed expectations, on the whole, and could have been so much worse - Boorman, anyone?
Well, if we don't get some new news from GDT soon some boards are going to be pretty dead!As for The Hobbit, I am sure the forums will pick up as the film(s) get closer
sf wrote:
I certainly hope so, as Di says, The Hobbit has the potential to be absolutely tremendous!I agree with you that HOBBIT will recharge the boards and fandom in general. I know many on these boards see a difference in Hobbit and LOTR but I do not think the public will. Its going to be big - very big.
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
~Diana Cortes
Yes.Mahima wrote:Pearly, did you know that without having to look it up?
I'll look like a right prune if I'm wrong about that, of course.
Ah, yes, Boorman. The crack!version.Elentári wrote:You expressed my feelings perfectly. They really did exceed expectations, on the whole, and could have been so much worse - Boorman, anyone?
Lordy.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal