Hidden text.
Search found 28764 matches
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:10 pm
- Forum: Golfimbul's Rabbit Hole
- Topic: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
- Replies: 4869
- Views: 417178
Re: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
Wordle 1,041 5/6
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:48 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
- Replies: 4055
- Views: 569171
Re: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
Christina Bobb, too
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:25 am
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
- Replies: 4055
- Views: 569171
Re: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
And going some 1,600 miles south-by-southwest from Michigan: " Arizona grand jury has indicted Trump allies for 2020 election interference " ( Politico ). Donald Trump is "Unindicted Co-Conspirator 1." (Ken Chesebro is "Unindicted Co-Conspirator 4.") Only some of the e...
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 1:25 am
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
- Replies: 4055
- Views: 569171
Re: 2020 Election: Predictions, Results and Reactions
I'm sure there are reasons, but it seems wrong to me (and I would guess to you as well) that Trump is an uninvited co-conspirator in both states. He is the head of the snake.
- Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:56 am
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
I don't think Howard or the rest of the staff gets them anything they can't get from Pecker.
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 11:03 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: The (no longer) much too early 2024 election thread
- Replies: 1120
- Views: 132558
Re: The (no longer) much too early 2024 election thread
That's disappointing but we are still a long ways away.
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:48 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
He's not going to prison in this case. A prison sentence for a first time offender on these charges would be contrary to usual practice.
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:57 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Capital punishment
- Replies: 535
- Views: 258611
Re: Capital punishment
Thanks for highlighting this (I'm impressed that you pulled up that exchange that I had with nerdanel back in 2015). I don't believe that I have ever seen the words "Brief for Respondent in Support of Petitioner" before. I will be very interested to see what happens, and particularly how v...
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:20 pm
- Forum: Golfimbul's Rabbit Hole
- Topic: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
- Replies: 4869
- Views: 417178
Re: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
Eeeep!
Wordle 1,040 6/6
Wordle 1,040 6/6
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 10:35 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
I'm not seeing the word "conspiracy" in either of those documents. And yet, the very first statement in the prosecutor Matthew Colangelo's opening statement was ""This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover up." This issue came up again today. The defense objected ...
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:06 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: The (no longer) much too early 2024 election thread
- Replies: 1120
- Views: 132558
Re: The (no longer) much too early 2024 election thread
Sarah Cooper!
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:03 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: The challenges ahead (Biden's America)
- Replies: 2018
- Views: 304894
Re: The challenges ahead (Biden's America)
I doubt the new rule with survive legal challenges, sadly. Not with the Roberts court.
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:06 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 6:08 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
Personally I would prefer not to have that kind of reporting here.
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:41 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
This pretty much sums up the gag order hearing so far.
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:19 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Charged With 37 counts of Espionage, Obstruction and related crimes
- Replies: 1093
- Views: 127659
Re: Trump Charged With 37 counts of Espionage, Obstruction and related crimes
There is a huge trowel of information that has been revealed now that Trump's motion to compel discovery and the hundreds of pages of exhibits have been docketed in a heavily redacted form. That motion was filed on January 16 and the opposition was filed on February 2, and Cannon still has not ruled.
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:11 pm
- Forum: Golfimbul's Rabbit Hole
- Topic: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
- Replies: 4869
- Views: 417178
Re: Games, Riddles, Puzzles, and other Distractions
Wordle 1,039 5/6
- Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:57 am
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
He also said
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:02 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
No. Cohen doesn't just get to decide what he can and cannot say, that is up the judge and Trump's violation of the gag order would more likely be relevant to impeaching Trump's own testimony (if he did testify) rather than justifying Cohen's name-calling. Anyway, saying "I'm sleazeball because ...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:24 pm
- Forum: Lasto Beth Lammen
- Topic: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
- Replies: 266
- Views: 38700
Re: Trump Indicted by Manhattan District Attorney
I meant to mention Trump's potential further violation of the gag order earlier, but didn't. I'm sure that the prosecutors will mention that at the hearing tomorrow, but I doubt that the judge will specifically address it (though maybe I am wrong).