It is currently Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:44 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 4:42 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
A heck of a lot of young people in this country are too sick or overweight to serve in the military. And of the fraction who are eligible and willing to serve, many of them are injured in training and unable to be deployed.

This is creating a crisis in the Army most of all, but all branches of the military are feeling the pinch. They are trying to come up with ways to train soldiers who are unfit to start with, without losing them to training injuries. Most of all they wish the states would encourage physical fitness more, so they'd get recruits in better shape to begin with.

It's being called "A Looming National Security Crisis".

Quote:
Facing Fitness Crisis, Army Leaders Look to Change Culture
The Fayetteville Observer, N.C. 27 Feb 2018 By Drew Brooks

Officials from U.S. Army Forces Command and U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command are working to fundamentally change the culture of fitness within the Army. Their efforts will impact everyone from the nation's newest recruits to its longest-serving soldiers.

The mission of the U.S. Army is to fight and win the nation's wars.

To that end, soldiers at installations across the globe train each day. They jump from planes. Maneuver across vast training areas. Shoot artillery. Fly helicopters. And drive tanks.

But while soldiers remain largely focused on potential enemies abroad, there's another fight underway within the ranks themselves.

Officials from U.S. Army Forces Command and U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command said they are working to fundamentally change the culture of fitness within the Army. Their efforts will impact everyone from the nation's newest recruits to its longest-serving soldiers.

Outside of the military, officials are tackling an even greater fitness challenge with what some have called a "looming national security crisis" caused by a lack of fitness in America's youth.

In the Army, the driving force behind the changes is a need to improve readiness. With deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan ongoing and a renewed focus on training to fight a near-peer threat, officials said soldier fitness is of growing importance.

More than 100,000 soldiers are unable to deploy, officials said. For a large percentage of those soldiers, it is due to injuries sustained during training.

And those soldiers are becoming harder to replace. An improving unemployment rate means fewer potential recruits are turning to the armed forces among a population that is already largely unfit to serve.

A recent Heritage Foundation report found that, according to 2017 Pentagon data, "71 percent of young Americans between 17 and 24 are ineligible to serve in the United States military." Nearly one-third of those young Americans are too overweight for military service.

"Put another way: Over 24 million of the 34 million people of that age group cannot join the armed forces -- even if they wanted to," said retired Lt. Gen. Thomas Spoehr and Bridget Handy, who authored the report, "The Looming National Security Crisis: Young Americans Unable to Serve in the Military."

The fitness of recruits is even more concerning in the South, which has traditionally been where the Army is most likely to find its force.

A recent study led by The Citadel in South Carolina in collaboration with the U.S. Army Public Health Center and the American Heart Association found that recruits from 10 Southern states -- Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas -- are "significantly less fit, and consequently are more likely to encounter training related injuries than recruits from other U.S. states."

Those 10 states have accounted for more than 37 percent of the Army's new recruits in recent years, according to data from U.S. Army Recruiting Command.

The Citadel study found that recruits from those states are 22 percent to 28 percent more likely to be injured, with each recruit lost to injury estimated to cost the Defense Department approximately $31,000.

Within the Army's current force, its fight for fitness is occurring on several fronts.
Forces Command, based at Fort Bragg, is developing a new tool to help leaders assess the combat fitness of their troops.

The commanding general of Forces Command, Gen. Robert B. "Abe" Abrams, has been a vocal leader in pushing fitness across the force and often participates in physical training while visiting units across the nation.

"I believe it is time to make a fundamental change in the way we train physical fitness," Abrams said.
Sixteen years of war have shown that the rigors of ground combat require every soldier to be fit, but current physical fitness tests fail to measure all areas of fitness, he said. The Army needed a new test that can drive changes necessary to better optimize soldier's fitness, improving the readiness of the Army's formations.

Another major Army command, Fort Eustis, Virginia-based Training and Doctrine Command, is developing a replacement for the Army Physical Fitness Test, while also working to introduce new standards for recruits and revamp training at the start of military careers. Officials are developing new doctrine, regulations and policies related to physical fitness.

The four-star commands -- along with other Army organizations -- are cooperating on what the Army calls its Holistic Health and Fitness initiative.

That initiative, years in the making, would include the creation of Soldier Performance Readiness Centers that would embed strength and conditioning coaches, physical therapists, nutritionists, sports psychologists, counselors and others within combat units.

Maj. Gen. Malcolm B. Frost, the commanding general for TRADOC's Center for Initial Military Training, said the efforts amount to "a generational shift in how the U.S. Army conducts fitness."

Soldiers are the Army's greatest weapon, Frost said, and they should be cared for and maintained just as the Army would care for any other weapon.

The Army has an entire system of armorers, mechanics and training ranges to ensure weapons are in top condition. But when it comes to soldiers -- "We don't have much" outside of Morale, Welfare and Recreation gyms and centralized medical facilities, Frost said.

He said the SPRCs -- pronounced "Sparks" -- would be a training range for the human body and the mind with a goal of ultimately preventing injuries and speeding up rehabilitation.

Frost said the full costs of the efforts are not yet known -- dependent on decisions not yet made by the chief of staff of the Army and the secretary of the Army -- but would represent an investment in the Army's future.

"I am absolutely confident that the investment we make in this will pale in comparison to the costs if we don't," he said.

The Center for Initial Military Training has a team of researchers, scientists and experts from the medical and physical fitness communities working on driving change across the Army. They get help from Forces Command, Army Medical Command, Army Special Operations Command and many others.

Michael S. McGurk, director of research and analysis at the Center for Initial Military Training, said the Army wants to avoid breaking the force through injuries or attrition caused by driving soldiers away. At the same time, the Army can't afford to only recruit the highest talent. There simply aren't enough people available.

Instead, he said, the Army must focus on building its force -- by recruiting the best quality soldiers it can and giving them what they need to improve.

That means monitoring nutrition, sleep, mental stress and spiritual well-being, as well as ensuring soldiers have the proper equipment to train their bodies as part of a one-stop shop for soldier fitness.
"All these things tie together because they're all related," McGurk said.
Part of the problem with the Army's existing culture of fitness lies with its most common measure of health -- the Army Physical Fitness Test.

The Army has used physical fitness tests in one form or another since 1858, when a test was first developed for cadets at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York. Tests and standards have fluctuated since. The current Army Physical Fitness Test, or APFT, was introduced in 1980 and has remained largely unchanged. It consists of two minutes of push-ups, two minutes of sit-ups and a two-mile run.

Col. Mike Kirkpatrick, director of leader development at Forces Command, said too often soldiers train specifically to do well on the APFT. That can lead to overuse injuries and take up time better spent training for the rigors of combat.

Kirkpatrick said Forces Command was developing the Soldier Readiness Test as a commander's tool to assess a unit's physical fitness program.

The Soldier Readiness Test must be completed by soldiers while wearing their Army Combat Uniform, boots and fully body armor. The events include a 225-pound tire flip, an agility test, a 240-pound dummy drag, a sandbag toss over a 7-foot barrier, a sandbag stack and a one-and-a-half mile run.
Kirkpatrick said a pilot program featuring the test was completed late last year. The pilot included troops with the 20th Engineer Brigade at Fort Bragg.

Based on feedback, Forces Command is refining parts of the SRT before further testing later this year, Kirkpatrick said. At the same time, the command will expand the test to even more battalions across the Army.

Meanwhile, TRADOC is developing the Army Combat Readiness Test that could eventually replace the APFT. The new, six-event test is designed to gauge five components of physical fitness, including muscular and cardiovascular endurance, strength, speed and explosive power. It consists of a deadlift, standing power throw, modified pushups, a sprint/drag/carry lane that simulates moving a wounded soldier or ammunition in combat, leg lifts and a two-mile run.

But to affect change on the largest scale, officials outside the Army warn that a much larger effort is needed to improve fitness across the country.

Daniel Bornstein, the exercise and sport science professor who authored the Citadel study on threats to military readiness and public health, said the issue of unfit youth is a big problem that the military has little hope of changing on its own.

"Military leaders have known this to be a problem for decades," he said. "They've been doing everything they can to solve this problem from the point of entry into the military forward."

"They have been making changes to the manner in which they carry out basic training in efforts to minimize the rate of injury. They have really done everything they can to make lemonade out of lemons," Bornstein added. "The reality is they are getting a lot of lemons."

Bornstein said the study, titled "Which U.S. States Pose the Greatest Threats to Military Readiness and Public Health? Public Health Policy Implications for a Cross-sectional Investigation of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Body Mass Index, and Injuries Among U.S. Army Recruits," was the result of a four-year effort.

The research was published in the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice last month.
Bornstein looked at fitness levels and injuries on a state by state basis to see if state and regional health trends in the South had an impact on Army recruits.

The rates of diabetes and heart disease and certain cancers are much greater in the South than they are in the rest of the country, he said. And the rates of obesity and physical inactivity are also significantly higher than in other states.

Bornstein, who created a course at the Citadel on physical activity and national security, said he was interested to find how those rates might affect Army recruits. He was not surprised by the results, because he sees something similar on a smaller scale at the Citadel.

New cadets at the military college are increasingly entering school less physically fit, he said. In response, the school has begun working with cadets to improve physical training programs and are stressing fitness as one of the school's pillars.

The Army recruits most heavily from southern states. But it's also where many of the country's long-running fitness troubles are worst.

"We've been telling people for 20 years that they should get more physical activity to improve health," Bornstein said. "Although it is the military's problem, it is not a problem they can solve. It really is society's problem to solve."

The Citadel professor said he hoped the states identified through this analysis, along with federal entities, will work to establish policies and environments proven to support physically active lifestyles.
"There are serious problems for military readiness and national security," Bornstein added. "And we have the answers. If we as a country and as individual states implemented the policy recommendations we would solve this problem."

The Heritage Foundation report, released earlier this month, outlines the stakes of having a population largely unfit to serve.

"The U.S. military is already having a hard time attracting enough qualified volunteers. Of the four services, the Army has the greatest annual need. The Army anticipates problems with meeting its 2018 goal to enlist 80,000 qualified volunteers, even with increased bonuses and incentives," according to the report.

Frost, the commander of the Center for Initial Military Training, has called the inability to man the military "the next existential threat we have."

Frost said the Army introduced the Occupational Physical Assessment Test, or OPAT, in part, to encourage recruits to begin physically training for the Army before they report to basic training. The test was introduced early last year for new Army recruits and soldiers changing military occupational specialties.

It measures a recruit's physical aptitude through four events -- a standing long jump, seated power throw, deadlift and interval run -- in much the same way that the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, or ASVAB, measures mental aptitude.

Before the OPAT, the Army did not have a true physical entrance requirement, Frost said. "Quite frankly, it was the strength that it took you to open the door to the recruiting center."

It's too early to know for sure, but Frost said there is some evidence that the test is having an impact by ensuring recruits are physically prepared for the rigors of the Army jobs they want. Since the test was introduced last year, the Army lost 1,400 fewer soldiers to attrition during basic training than past averages.

McGurk said the OPAT also could have a deeper impact, helping to change a mindset among recruits.
In the past, someone might have joined the Army assuming that 10 weeks of basic training and anywhere from four to 26 weeks of Advanced Individual Training would help get him into the shape needed to serve, he said. But the OPAT encourages recruits to get into shape before basic training in order to be successful in their training.

McGurk compared it to being on a soccer team.

"If you want to be a good soccer player, you can't show up on the first day of school and be good," he said. "There's six weeks of practice before the season started. We're kind of bringing that idea around to the Army ... it's preseason for basic training."


https://www.military.com/daily-news/201 ... _180227.nl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:46 pm 
Online
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 13373
Location: Out on the banks
Well, I know how the Soviets solved it. There was a set of standards known as GTO, which stood for Ready for Labor and Defense, and every school kid had to meet them to get a passing grade in physical education, which counted at the same level as other classes. There were medical exceptions, and they tended to go easy on girls, who were not subject to the mandatory service. It wasn't anything too difficult, just a certain number of push-ups, sit-ups, and maximum time for various running distances, IIRC.

Of course that was before all the screens.

I do find it ironic that we keep hearing about those hardy outdoorsy country boys, yet it's those Southern states that are named as the least fit.

_________________
Image
‘There’s no greys, only white that’s got grubby. I’m surprised you don’t know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That’s what sin is.’
‘It’s a lot more complicated than that -’
‘No. It ain’t. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they’re getting worried that they won’t like the truth. People as things, that’s where it starts.’
Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:58 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
I wonder why that is? I mean, I knew the southern states are economically depressed- I just figured that was from getting whapped with serious hurricane damage every decade or so. Why do they get more physical problems than average, as well?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 2:45 am 
Online
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 13373
Location: Out on the banks
I don't know the answer, but that area tends to light up the maps for lifestyle-related problems. Rates of Type A diabetes, deaths from heart disease, deaths from cancer (but not overall cancer rates) are all highest in that region. The prevalence of binge drinking is fairly low overall, but the severity again is high. This is all from a few quick searches, which mostly led to cdc.gov.

_________________
Image
‘There’s no greys, only white that’s got grubby. I’m surprised you don’t know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That’s what sin is.’
‘It’s a lot more complicated than that -’
‘No. It ain’t. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they’re getting worried that they won’t like the truth. People as things, that’s where it starts.’
Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:37 am
Posts: 4758
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
I'm not an expert, but if I was forced to take a guess I'd pick a traditionally high-fat diet (Southern comfort food), lower income levels, and lower education levels.

Interesting article, by the way. 71% is a staggeringly high number.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:52 am 
Online
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 13373
Location: Out on the banks
Yeah, but given that it's the number from Heritage Foundation, and not, say, the CDC, I would like a bit more info on how they arrived at it.

_________________
Image
‘There’s no greys, only white that’s got grubby. I’m surprised you don’t know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That’s what sin is.’
‘It’s a lot more complicated than that -’
‘No. It ain’t. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they’re getting worried that they won’t like the truth. People as things, that’s where it starts.’
Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:13 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
71% is astounding.

Quote:
A recent Heritage Foundation report found that, according to 2017 Pentagon data, "71 percent of young Americans between 17 and 24 are ineligible to serve in the United States military.


"According to 2017 Pentagon data".
If that reference is correct, I'm inclined to trust the data. Who has more incentive to study this sort of thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
Wrong within normal parameters
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:59 am
Posts: 4348
Location: The other side of Michigan
But are all 71% due to fitness issues?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
I assume being fit covers both strength and health issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
Wrong within normal parameters
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:59 am
Posts: 4348
Location: The other side of Michigan
I agree, but the quote doesn't say 71% are ineleigable to serve due to fitness, it just says 71% are ineligible to serve. What factors other than health and fitness might disqualify someone?

It does add that one third of those 71% (~24%) are overweight, so that's a lower bound anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:36 pm 
Online
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 13373
Location: Out on the banks
But it also doesn't say that they are unfit to serve BECAUSE they are overweight. I dunno, I think if I were reporting on this, I'd have gone to dig up Pentagon's data.

But that's a minor point.

_________________
Image
‘There’s no greys, only white that’s got grubby. I’m surprised you don’t know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That’s what sin is.’
‘It’s a lot more complicated than that -’
‘No. It ain’t. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they’re getting worried that they won’t like the truth. People as things, that’s where it starts.’
Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:38 pm 
Offline
Wrong within normal parameters
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:59 am
Posts: 4348
Location: The other side of Michigan
What it says is:
Quote:
A recent Heritage Foundation report found that, according to 2017 Pentagon data, "71 percent of young Americans between 17 and 24 are ineligible to serve in the United States military." Nearly one-third of those young Americans are too overweight for military service.

But yeah, the foundation could be putting its own spin on the Pentagon's data, or just misunderstanding it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:41 pm 
Online
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 13373
Location: Out on the banks
Oh, I see. I missed that part. There are still some hairs to be split :D but they are not that relevant.

_________________
Image
‘There’s no greys, only white that’s got grubby. I’m surprised you don’t know that. And sin, young man, is when you treat people as things. Including yourself. That’s what sin is.’
‘It’s a lot more complicated than that -’
‘No. It ain’t. When people say things are a lot more complicated than that, they means they’re getting worried that they won’t like the truth. People as things, that’s where it starts.’
Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:42 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
Quote:
Eligibility rules can be a little confusing. There are different rules for enlisting and for officer programs. Enlisting: Enlisted members do the hands-on work of the military. They need at least a high school degree (a GED may or may not suffice). Officer: Officers are the managers of the military. Most officer programs require a college degree at minimum, and are very competitive. Many officers have master's or higher degrees. Before you visit your local recruiter, be sure you meet the minimum qualifications for serving in the U.S. Armed Forces. Some qualifications are required by all five services:

You must be a U.S. citizen or resident alien.
You must be at least 17 years old (17-year old applicants require parental consent).
You must (with very few exceptions) have a high school diploma.
You must pass a physical medical exam.
For each branch, there are slightly different enlistment requirements:


To join the...

Air Force You must:
Be between the ages of 17-27. *
Have no more than two dependents.
Pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude test. (Minimum AFQT Score: 50)

Army You must:
Be between the ages of 17-34. *
Have no more than two dependents.
Pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude test. (Minimum AFQT Score: 31)

Coast Guard You must:
Be between the ages of 17- 39*
Have no more than two dependents.
Pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test. (Minimum AFQT Score: 45)
Have a willingness to serve on or around the water.

Marines You must:
Meet exacting physical, mental, and moral standards.
Be between the ages of 17-29. *
Pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test. (Minimum AFQT Score: 32)
Women are eligible to enlist in all occupational exception of combat arms specialties: infantry, tank and amphibian tractor crew.

Navy You must:
Be between the ages of 17-34. *
Pass the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test. (Minimum AFQT Score: 50)
Women are eligible to enlist in all occupational fields, with the exception of serving in the Navy Seals or on submarines.

* Age limits vary based on active-duty, prior service, or reserve. In addition, 17-year old applicants require parental consent.


https://www.military.com/join-armed-for ... ility.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
Too many kids disqualifies one from 3 of the services.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 3:56 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33170
Why is the required AFQT score so much lower for the Army and Marines then the other three services?

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 4:16 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
Probably so they'll get the ones the other branches don't want, in order to fill their slots that don't require a lot of technical ability. There were plenty of the *not so bright* in the units I served with, even though the communications specialties do require some brains to master. You can always put them to work in the motor pool. Or in the supply section.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 4:21 pm 
Offline
Hobbit
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 5049
Location: Missouri
Also, fyi, the AFQT is a percentile score.

When I enlisted, I got a very high score... but I don't remember what it was. I was told I could train for just about anything I wanted, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 4:33 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33170
Thanks!

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fitness Crisis
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:05 pm 
Offline
bioalchemist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:08 am
Posts: 9915
Location: the dry land
I've seen alarm bells sounded about lack of fitness in young people becoming a problem for the military about once every three or four years since I started paying attention to the news. I even had a classmate in HS who ran into trouble when he tried to enlist in the Air Force because he had a weight problem and that wa 19 years ago now. This isn't a new problem, though for some reason no one's talking about it.

Maria wrote:
I wonder why that is? I mean, I knew the southern states are economically depressed- I just figured that was from getting whapped with serious hurricane damage every decade or so. Why do they get more physical problems than average, as well?

It's easy to point to too much soul food, but I suspect that's trying to give a complicated problem an easy answer. There are people who overeat because they find food comforting and their lives are stressful. There are also people who end up consuming a lot of empty calories because, in the US, a nice healthy diet of produce and whole grains and so on isn't always the cheapest or most accessible option. And if exercising just isn't a thing, or if people are working multiple jobs to make ends meet and don't have time or energy for exercise, those extra calories don't get burned off.

_________________
When you can do nothing what can you do?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group