I don't think he complains about the inclusion of the background. Rather, it was about beginning the movie with it, instead of Tolkien's iconic quote.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:It's not a question of being an expert, hal. The things that he complains about show a lack of appreciation of Tolkien, not of Jackson. Such as complaining about showing the Dwarves as miners, and other background history of the Dwarves. So much of what makes Tolkien so great is the depth of his stories.
Critical Reception of The Hobbit: AUJ [Massive SPOILERS!]
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
But the film does apparently begin with Tolkien's iconic quote. And his description of the scene as "an interminable narrative detour" and "details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody" show that he is not just complaining about the placement in the beginning but including so much detail.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
Has it been confirmed that the film starts with "In a hole in the ground, there lived a hobbit?" If so, that would be delightful news.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:But the film does apparently begin with Tolkien's iconic quote. And his description of the scene as "an interminable narrative detour" and "details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody" show that he is not just complaining about the placement in the beginning but including so much detail.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
It has definitely been confirmed that it is there, but I am unclear as to just how close to the very beginning it is. Let me see what I can dig up.
Of course, when Alatar shows up he can answer, but it looks that won't be until at the earliest tomorow morning, Irish time.
Of course, when Alatar shows up he can answer, but it looks that won't be until at the earliest tomorow morning, Irish time.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
According to that review:Shelob'sAppetite wrote:Has it been confirmed that the film starts with "In a hole in the ground, there lived a hobbit?" If so, that would be delightful news.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:But the film does apparently begin with Tolkien's iconic quote. And his description of the scene as "an interminable narrative detour" and "details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody" show that he is not just complaining about the placement in the beginning but including so much detail.
Now, to take this last chance at unbridled speculation, this may not be a BAD decision by PJ. It is similar to how FOTR started with an epic prologue, which certainly only added to the subsequent move to the Shire. Besides, we've seen the Shire.The book begins with the unimprovable ten-word opening sentence: “In a hole in the ground there lived a Hobbit.” Jackson, by contrast, starts with an interminable narrative detour about a mining operation run by a team of dwarfs, involving magic crystals, orc armies and details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody.
But I do have to say that the few reviews I read raise similar concerns - the say the movies are overstuffed with superfluous material, overblown action scenes and boring background information. I suppose I will see in a few weeks how much of it I agree with.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
I know I will love the flashbacks, etc, as they give depth to the world (something Tolkien can do with a simple line or two, really does need to be visualized on film in order to achieve the same effect). However, I am 100% certain that I will cringe often at PJ's over-the-top (and now super-CGI) action scenes. The Goblintown clip we saw looks atrocious.Frelga wrote:According to that review:Shelob'sAppetite wrote:Has it been confirmed that the film starts with "In a hole in the ground, there lived a hobbit?" If so, that would be delightful news.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:But the film does apparently begin with Tolkien's iconic quote. And his description of the scene as "an interminable narrative detour" and "details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody" show that he is not just complaining about the placement in the beginning but including so much detail.
Now, to take this last chance at unbridled speculation, this may not be a BAD decision by PJ. It is similar to how FOTR started with an epic prologue, which certainly only added to the subsequent move to the Shire. Besides, we've seen the Shire.The book begins with the unimprovable ten-word opening sentence: “In a hole in the ground there lived a Hobbit.” Jackson, by contrast, starts with an interminable narrative detour about a mining operation run by a team of dwarfs, involving magic crystals, orc armies and details of dwarf family trees that are of interest, at this early stage in what is supposed to be a family film, to almost nobody.
But I do have to say that the few reviews I read raise similar concerns - the say the movies are overstuffed with superfluous material, overblown action scenes and boring background information. I suppose I will see in a few weeks how much of it I agree with.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Telemachos wrote:It's not at the very beginning, but it's early on.Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:Is "In a hole in a ground ... [ect., etc}" said at the very beginning of the film? If not, where is it placed?
Thanks again!
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
Got it. I imagine Ian Holm will say the line as he starts to read from the book to Frodo, which will probably then fade or cut to Freeman as Bilbo, smoking on the bench.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Telemachos wrote:It's not at the very beginning, but it's early on.Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:Is "In a hole in a ground ... [ect., etc}" said at the very beginning of the film? If not, where is it placed?
Thanks again!
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
An excellent review with a knowledgable and balanced assessment of the film's strengths and weaknesses and perhaps the best discussion of the HFR that I have seen.
http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/the-hobbit-an ... ey-review/
Inched back up to 75%.
http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/the-hobbit-an ... ey-review/
Inched back up to 75%.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
Having not seen 48fps, how do you know his discussion of it is the best?Voronwë the Faithful wrote:An excellent review with a knowledgable and balanced assessment of the film's strengths and weaknesses and perhaps the best discussion of the HFR that I have seen.
http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/the-hobbit-an ... ey-review/
Inched back up to 75%.
For example, he says the following:
How, exactly, can that claim be "false," if it is the perception of a viewer we are talking about? If it looks like TV to a number of people, then it looks like TV to those people! And speaking from experience (though limited to a documentary-style production) I also find that 48fps reminds me of TV. In particular, BBC TV from the 70s.The claim that the film looks less cinematic (“like TV” was a regular complaint) is a false one.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Review: The Hobbit Is Insanely Gorgeous at 48 Frames Per Second
Probably not very surprising that the folks at Wired like the new technology. They like the film alot, too.
Probably not very surprising that the folks at Wired like the new technology. They like the film alot, too.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Because he says what I want to hear, of course!Shelob'sAppetite wrote:Having not seen 48fps, how do you know his discussion of it is the best?
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Meanwhile, RT has now switched the Slate review to rotten, and it is now down to 71%. And an abysmal 1 out of 7 of the "top critics".
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Anthony Lane at the New Yorker quite liked it—his review is not a rave, but has an affectionate tone even when carping, and he clearly is familiar with the book (he refers to his "worn paperback" and writes knowledgeably about Tolkien and LotR). I expect that one will come up "fresh." (He singles out both Freeman and Armitage for special praise.)
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
However, do not read The New Yorker's article about why The Hobbit (edit: book) is better than The Lord of the Rings:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/b ... rings.html
I'm conflicted about the extent to which the author is deliberately trolling.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/b ... rings.html
I'm conflicted about the extent to which the author is deliberately trolling.
Last edited by Dave_LF on Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
In my view, Lane doesn't have the best eye for film. But I am delighted that he seems to have liked it!Primula Baggins wrote:Anthony Lane at the New Yorker quite liked it—his review is not a rave, but has an affectionate tone even when carping, and he clearly is familiar with the book (he refers to his "worn paperback" and writes knowledgeably about Tolkien and LotR). I expect that one will come up "fresh." (He singles out both Freeman and Armitage for special praise.)
- Stranger Wings
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:00 pm
Anthony Lane's will at least change that a bit.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Meanwhile, RT has now switched the Slate review to rotten, and it is now down to 71%. And an abysmal 1 out of 7 of the "top critics".
I am getting the sense that some of the "top" reviewers finally feel they can bare their anti-fantasy teeth on this one, and that this is contributing to some of the extremely negative responses. I just can't believe how many times "leisurely pace" has been derided thus far. Most of these reviewers loved some of the most leisurely films out there, such as most of Malick's work. Why do they find it inappropriate in fantasy?
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Here is Lane's review: http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/c ... inema_lane
Quite a nice read, although I hope I disagree with him about Radagast.
Quite a nice read, although I hope I disagree with him about Radagast.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Sorry for not linking it! I subscribe, so I figured others might not be able to see it online.
I hope I disagree about Radagast too, although it's not a dealbreaker for me.
I hope I disagree about Radagast too, although it's not a dealbreaker for me.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46488
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Yeah, I was little surprised that I was able to read it. The Times of London has what seems to be a good review, but it actually is only available to subscribers.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film ... 625874.ece
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film ... 625874.ece
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."