The New York Times featured an editorial today entitled, "In Praise of Tap Water," urging consumers to rethink their choice to pay for billions of gallons of bottled water. Here is this argument. A few thoughts of mine below.
I recently stopped drinking bottled water myself, based on a similar plea from a San Francisco restaurant whose philosophy I greatly respect.On the streets of New York or Denver or San Mateo this summer, it seems the telltale cap of a water bottle is sticking out of every other satchel. Americans are increasingly thirsty for what is billed as the healthiest, and often most expensive, water on the grocery shelf. But this country has some of the best public water supplies in the world. Instead of consuming four billion gallons of water a year in individual-sized bottles, we need to start thinking about what all those bottles are doing to the planet’s health.
Here are the hard, dry facts: Yes, drinking water is a good thing, far better than buying soft drinks, or liquid candy, as nutritionists like to call it. And almost all municipal water in America is so good that nobody needs to import a single bottle from Italy or France or the Fiji Islands. Meanwhile, if you choose to get your recommended eight glasses a day from bottled water, you could spend up to $1,400 annually. The same amount of tap water would cost about 49 cents.
Next, there’s the environment. Water bottles, like other containers, are made from natural gas and petroleum. The Earth Policy Institute in Washington has estimated that it takes about 1.5 million barrels of oil to make the water bottles Americans use each year. That could fuel 100,000 cars a year instead. And, only about 23 percent of those bottles are recycled, in part because water bottles are often not included in local redemption plans that accept beer and soda cans. Add in the substantial amount of fuel used in transporting water, which is extremely heavy, and the impact on the environment is anything but refreshing.
Tap water may now be the equal of bottled water, but that could change. The more the wealthy opt out of drinking tap water, the less political support there will be for investing in maintaining America’s public water supply. That would be a serious loss. Access to cheap, clean water is basic to the nation’s health.
Some local governments have begun to fight back. Earlier this summer, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom prohibited his city’s departments and agencies from buying bottled water, noting that San Francisco water is “some of the most pristine on the planet.” Salt Lake City has issued a similar decree, and New York City recently began an advertising campaign that touted its water as “clean,” “zero sugar” and even “stain free.”
The real change, though, will come when millions of ordinary consumers realize that they can save money, and save the planet, by turning in their water bottles and turning on the tap.
I immediately stopped buying bottled water and went out and bought a Brita filter (San Francisco tap water may be "pristine," but San Jose's can be sketchy.) Never let it be said that I am not a sheep.WHERE’S THE BOTTLED WATER?
As part of our efforts to do good for the environment, we have decided to stop carrying bottled water for two reasons (and we hope you support us and help spread the word):
1. Every year, Americans drink more bottles of water than there are people in China (1.2 billion bottles of water). By our decision alone, [restaurant] is removing nearly 10,000 bottles from recycling and landfill. And, we are also removing our part of the 22 million gallons of oil used to transport bottled water.
2. There is a current heated debate about “...what’s in your bottled water.” Because the ingredients in bottled water need not be published it has been found that much of the bottled water out there is actually low-grade tap water! At [restaurant], we filter our water several times. So, if you do want water, please just ask for tap!
We apologize for any inconvenience, and hope you understand our stance on bottled water, and support us in our environmental efforts. Spread the word, and drink filtered water at home, and request it when you go out.
Since I've educated myself on this topic, it seems blatantly obvious that filtered tap water is cheaper, more consistently likely to remove impurities, more environmentally friendly, and even politically savvy from a liberal perspective (see the Times' point with respect to the integrity of the public water supply being linked to the wealthy (and middle-class) not opting out; also, obviously anything that reduces dependency on foreign oil continues to be a good thing.) Plus? Filtered tap water tastes MUCH better - in my subjective, and probably placebo-mentality judgment - than any bottled water I've ever had. I'm drinking far more water than before, which is a good thing.
Another concern of mine is related to fluoride. I know that controversy rages whether fluoride in water is desirable or safe. I don't know who is right - but I know that I grew up drinking tap water without a single cavity, and have had three or four while drinking bottled water. For right now, I feel good about Brita not filtering out fluoride...but we'll see if that stays true if an extra halogenic arm grows out of the back of my head.
I am concerned that bottled water is here to stay, however. It's the fad that won't die. People think they are being virtuous by purchasing water rather than soda, and for those on the go, it is much easier to grab a bottle and run, rather than filling a reused bottle with tap water the day before. I am certain that many, if not most, consumers of bottled water haven't given too much thought to the fluoride debate one way or another. I've also encountered many people who erroneously assume that the number of plastic bottles they consume is nearly irrelevant so long as they recycle them. More than anything, I think bottled water will stick around because people don't really have reason to think about it; on the surface, it seems healthy, convenient, and tasty.
I'm starting to wonder whether some anti-bottled water evangelism is necessary, however. Thoughts?