International Civility (or lack thereof)

The place for measured discourse about politics and current events, including developments in science and medicine.
User avatar
vison
Best friends forever
Posts: 11961
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Post by vison »

themary wrote:[derail] OMG I did it, I finally hit the nail on the head, Jny you just made my day, scratch that my weekend! :banana: [/end derail]

Where might one find the speech in print? In all honesty I haven't read it but would like to :)
Chavez's speech? Don't know.

Mr. Bush's speech is at the link in my post.
Dig deeper.
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it.

Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books, 'Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.'" [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.] "It's an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what's happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet.

The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time," [flips through the pages, which are numerous] "I will just leave it as a recommendation.

It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house.

The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house.

"And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here." [crosses himself] "And it smells of sulfur still today."

Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.
I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.

An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe."

As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The world parent's statement -- cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything.

They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons.

What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy.

What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs?

The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom."

Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother -- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him.

The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.

I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination.

The president then -- and this he said himself, he said: "I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace."

That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They'll say yes.

But the government doesn't want peace. The government of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.

It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela -- new threats against Venezuela, against Iran?

He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision?

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is crossfire? He's thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.

This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering because we see homes destroyed.'

The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples -- to the peoples of the world. He came to say -- I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly.

And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say?

And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, the oppressed people think. They would say, "Yankee imperialist, go home." I think that is what those people would say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists.

And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eight years, and we said something that has now been confirmed -- fully, fully confirmed.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I don't think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let's accept -- let's be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It's worthless.

Oh, yes, it's good to bring us together once a year, see each other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen to good speeches, like Abel's (ph) yesterday, or President Mullah's (ph). Yes, it's good for that.

And there are a lot of speeches, and we've heard lots from the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile.

But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations.

Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it.

The first is expansion, and Mullah (ph) talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That's step one.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions.

Point three, the immediate suppression -- and that is something everyone's calling for -- of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council.

Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented.

Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we've always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations.

Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions.

Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking.

Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council.

Let's see. Well, there's been an open attack by the U.S. government, an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely elected to a post in the Security Council.

The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.

And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there's no need to announce things.

But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us.

Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur.

And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia or China and many others.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela's thoughts, but it will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend dignity and truth.

Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said "helplessly optimistic," because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning.

As Sylvia Rodriguez (ph) says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now?

What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision.

We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness. We have to build a new and better world.

Venezuela joins that struggle, and that's why we are threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier.

And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists.

And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner.

And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government.

And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to.

And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace.

Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I'm here today.

But these people who led that coup are here today in this country protected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from there happily.

And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the outcome document. Don't worry, I'm not going to read it.

But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter -- more than 50 heads of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum.

And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism.

And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently.

Unfortunately they thought, "Oh, Fidel was going to die." But they're going to be disappointed because he didn't. And he's not only alive, he's back in his green fatigues, and he's now presiding the nonaligned.

So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south.

With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I'm now closing my file. I'm taking the book with me. And, don't forget, I'm recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations.

And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We've proposed Venezuela.

You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here, but God is with us and I embrace you all.

May God bless us all. Good day to you.

(APPLAUSE)
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
spd
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Springfield, Ill.

Post by spd »

I bet Chomsky had no idea he was going to get such great free advertising. :rofl:
Last edited by spd on Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Come a day there won't be room for naughty men like us to slip about at all."
User avatar
themary
Prettiest City I know!
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Location: Taking comfort in others

Post by themary »

Thank you Voronwë :)

Chavez's speech, vison but thanks :)
...the embers never fade in your city by the lake

The place where you were born
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

spd wrote:I bet Chomsky had no idea he was going to get such great free advertising. :rofl:
I'd be curious to know how he felt about the speech. I'm sure he would fully agree with the substantive comment, but I wonder how he feels about being so closely connected to Chavez's "devil" comments.

You're welcome, mary. :)

[Edited to remove an unwelcome comma]
Last edited by Voronwë the Faithful on Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
MithLuin
Fëanoriondil
Posts: 1912
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:13 pm

Post by MithLuin »

You know, reading the speech, the rhetoric just sounds like...rhetoric. I mean, I get that the guy is no friend to the USA (or at least, its govt)...but it sorta just...sounds flat.

This line, however, caught my attention.
The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It's worthless.
At first, I thought he was calling for abolishing the UN :shock: Then I realized, he was talking about making a few changes. One of those changes - the Security Council veto - seemed to be tied directly to the recent use of it by the US. But somehow, I doubt he minded when the Security Council voted in his favor, veto or no.... so that wasn't terribly impressive. But he was very dismissive of the UN - "yes, it's nice we all give speeches, but what do we do?"

For all he talks about US imperialism....Venezuela has oil, and is a member of OPEC. It's not like his country has no clout at all! This was clear when he named his allies.... I work with a guy who lived in Venezuela for nearly 20 years; I'll have to ask him what he thinks of all this.

The people on the street in Saudi Arabia were fairly sympathetic to Osama bin Laden; but the Saudi govt was a US ally. It would have been extremely unwise for Bush to alienate one of our few allies in the Middle East.
Jnyusa
Posts: 7283
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:04 am

Post by Jnyusa »

The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.

I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.
This passage was the most unwise, imo. It sounds as if he is endorsing terrorism.

Jn
A fool's paradise is a wise man's hell.
Holbytla
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:31 pm

Post by Holbytla »

Whistler wrote:I must say that I was pleased to find so many hard-left Democrats expressing their disgust at this thug's ignorant ranting.

I would be very relieved to see us return to a day when, however much we argue among ourselves, an insult from someone outside the American family is taken personally by all.
I think that when you look at things from a broad perspective, the US is a generally liberal society compared with the rest of the planet.
I am not surprised our two parties saw things evenly on this one.
In the grand scheme of things we are closer than we like to admit.
User avatar
Túrin Turambar
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by Túrin Turambar »

vison wrote:And I would like to point out, gently, a la Peggy Noonan, that it might behoove Americans to remember the language employed by your current president (and past presidents) when speaking of some other nations and those nations' leaders.

"Axis of Evil", anyone?

However, I agree that the world would be a better place if everyone was civil, at least in speech. Civility in action seems but a foolish dream.

Edited to add: I searched for the term "axis of evil" and the first site that popped up was the White House site and the text of this speech by Mr. Bush:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases ... 29-11.html

I have to say, it made very interesting reading, in light of subsequent events.
As a keen student of oratory and rhetoric, I thought that was a pretty good speech (minus the bizarre and inflammatory parts). Then again, one would probably expect the President of the United States to find someone good to write the most important speech of the year.

The ‘Axis of evil’ was a foolish thing to say also because it targeted countries that need not have been targeted. Nasty countries, sure, but as I’ve always argued here, not all nasty countries are equal. At least Reagan directed his ‘evil empire’ comments (which were appropriate IMHO) at a country that posed a clear and present danger.
Jnyusa wrote: I believe the Canadian Parliament often resembles a free-for-all, with people leaning over the bannisters and screaming at one another.
Parliaments, especially the lower houses, are traditionally fairly rowdy. Some East Asian country (I can’t remember which) had a fistfight break out during a debate a couple of years ago. It makes sense given its historical context, but still seems a bit odd by today’s standards. This was an argument made against broadcasting Question Time in Australian Federal Parliament live on TV – it would bring the institution into disrepute. Watching it, I can kinda see their point – the most recent session saw several members thrown out for swearing, one disciplined for giving the opposition the finger, and a good third of the members sitting up the back asleep or doing crosswords (admittedly, Australian Parliaments are very rowdy, even by world standards). State Parliaments are even worse.

Going back to the subject of this thread, I can remember the former leader of the Australian Labor Party standing up in Parliament and calling George W. Bush ‘the most dangerous President in living memory’, saying that the Prime Minister was an ‘arselicker’ for following him, and that his Government was a ‘conga line of suckholes’, including a ‘filthy, rotten disgrace of a foreign minister’. He did it for the same reason that Chavez did – he was making an appeal to his base. Didn’t win him the election, though.
Jnyusa wrote:
The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.

I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.
This passage was the most unwise, imo. It sounds as if he is endorsing terrorism.
Agreed.

Legitimate criticism of United States policy, foreign and domestic, can be made. Chavez has demonstrated how not to make it.

Edit: Taiwan is notorious for fighting breaking out in its legislature. For example, from Oct. 27, 2004:
Taiwan lawmaker Chen Tsung-yi (L) from the ruling Democratic Progressive Party throws a book at opposition legislators after a food fight erupted in parliament, October 26, 2004. The lawmakers hurled their lunch boxes at each other in a quarrel over whether to include an $18 billion U.S. arms budget on the legislative agenda for Friday. (Reuters)


And I believe that the Russian legislature (or the legislature of one of its provinces) has needed to hire bouncers to keep its members in order
ToshoftheWuffingas
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:34 pm

Post by ToshoftheWuffingas »

Considering the right wing death squads that cursed South and Central America from the 1950's to relatively recently and that murdered hundreds of thousands of students, teachers, trade unionists, left wing politicians and farmers with the help and advice of the US military, I think Chavez is allowed a little hyperbole.
Jnyusa
Posts: 7283
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:04 am

Post by Jnyusa »

Tosh,

I doubt that anyone outside the US doubts for a minute that the substance of Chavez' speech is correct. The US has sponsored terrorism all over the world for as long as I've been alive - not just in Monroe Doctrine countries but in countries whose names never even appear in our press.

The question in the world arena, I would guess, is not whether Chavez himself believes it or even whether it is true, but whether it is smart to talk about it in this manner. I doubt that Chavez would welcome an expansion of terrorism because he has factions at home that are much further to the left than he is and prone to random violence. But it does sound in places that he is saying, "You got what was coming to you." If he wants to reform the UN, that is not a good way to promote his ideas, I think. It will be important to convince TPTB that opening the UN security council more will not simply expose it to instability and radicalism.

Jn
A fool's paradise is a wise man's hell.
Post Reply