![Smile :)](./images/smilies/77smile.gif)
I think I understand better now - I thought you were drawing a parallel between the two concepts as a whole, rather than more specifically between Melkor and Kali!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/77smile.gif)
From the point of view of Tolkien's creation myth, I think the paths that were not taken in the thoughts of the Ainur were not created, therefore it could be argued that any path not chosen does not come into existence.This leaves an infinite number of paths not taken. Do the worlds, through which these other paths run, exist, or is my path the only path that is real?
Um, no, I don't think he held his father dearer than anything. If he did, he wouldn't have given him such trouble over re-marrying, IMO.for his father was dearer to him than the Light of Valinor or the peerless works of his hands; and who among sons, of Elves or of Men, have held their fathers of greater worth?
Ah. Well, Tolkien painted evil in fairly absolute, one dimensional terms, I think. ... there are no shades of gray in Melkor, Sauron, the Orcs, Shelob or Ungoliant .... even so, her ultimate demise seems a bit obscure.Another thing I find interesting is Ungoliant being so insatiable that she devoured herself in the end - it's quite a fascinating idea, I think, and I'd love to hear people's take on this!
Hobby, this hearkens back to the long post I made at the beginning of this thread (which no one, not even Ath or Sass, commented on) with quotes from Tolkien's letters about how he saw the Valar's role as sub-creators. Using Rowan's neat trick (which I did not know about before, thanks Rowantruehobbit wrote:From the point of view of Tolkien's creation myth, I think the paths that were not taken in the thoughts of the Ainur were not created, therefore it could be argued that any path not chosen does not come into existence.This leaves an infinite number of paths not taken. Do the worlds, through which these other paths run, exist, or is my path the only path that is real?
In the real world I think the same.
The way I look at it, the Valar are like actors in a play. They have seen the script, but they are still free to improvise. However, if they stray too far from the Director's vision, He is not above stepping into the action to steer it back on course.Tolkien wrote:The Ainur took part in the making of the world as ‘sub-creators’: in various degrees, after this fashion. They interpreted according to their powers, and completed in detail, the Design propounded to them by the One. This was propounded first in musical or abstract form, and then in an ‘historical vision’. In the first interpretation, the vast Music of the Ainur, Melkor introduced alterations, not interpretations of the mind of the One, and great discord arose. The One then presented this ‘Music’, including the apparent discords, as a visible ‘history.’
At this stage it had still only a validity, to which the validity of a ‘story’ among ourselves may be compared: it ‘exists’ in the mind of the teller, and derivatively in the minds of hearers, but not on the same plane as teller or hearers. When the One (the Teller) said Let it Be* (* Hence the Elves called the World, the Universe, Eä), then the Tale became History, on the same plane as the hearers; and these could, if they desired, enter into it. Many of the Ainur did enter into it, and must bide in it till the End, being involved in Time, the series of events that complete it. These were the Valar, and their lesser attendants. They were those who had ‘fallen in love’ with the vision, and no doubt, were those who had played the most ‘sub-creative’ (or as we might say ‘artistic’) part in the Music. (Letter 212, p. 284.)
Hobby, this is something that I alluded to previously (back at b77). Clearly Tolkien is stating as a fact that Fëanor did truly love his father dearly, despite his selfish pridefulness. As I wrote before:Hobby wrote:So, here's one detail that bugged me:
On hearing of his father's murder, Fëanor leaves the Ring of DoomUm, no, I don't think he held his father dearer than anything. If he did, he wouldn't have given him such trouble over re-marrying, IMO.for his father was dearer to him than the Light of Valinor or the peerless works of his hands; and who among sons, of Elves or of Men, have held their fathers of greater worth?
He had the typical jealousy reaction, so that shows that he was ambitious for his father's love, but he apparently didn't love him very selflessly, and therefore, IMO, can't be said to have held him dearer than anything else.
But this is an auctorial (or rather narratorial?) comment - it's not Fëanor praising himself for his love for his father, it seems to be the author's view.
So, what do you guys make of this?
I wrote:But Fëanor, for all his fearful pride, is yet an object of sympathy, running from the Ring of Doom and fleeing into the night for his grief at the killing of his father, who "was dearer to him than the Light of Valinor or the peerless works of his hands; and who among sons, Elves or of Men, have held their fathers of greater worth?" Would the bitterness in his heart at the slaying of his father as well as the rape of his precious Silmarils not still led him to the same path even if he had freely agreed to give up the Silmarils when asked, or would his grief have been free of the madness that drove the Noldor to exile and misery? We can only speculate, but I suspect that Tolkien is suggesting that it would have.
This is the type of emotional manipulation that Tolkien does so well. I really should NOT feel sympathy for Fëanor here. Tolkien's typically hyperbolic statements really should not have any effect at all. But the language is so high and florid that I can't help but be moved by these sentiments, unsupported by facts though they might be.
I'll just quote Athrabeth here, from this great post at b77 (boy do I love that feature!!!!), responding to something that Sassy said:Hobby wrote:Another thing I find interesting is Ungoliant being so insatiable that she devoured herself in the end - it's quite a fascinating idea, I think, and I'd love to hear people's take on this!
Ath wrote:I’m not so sure that Ungoliant can’t exist without consuming light. Tolkien tells us that she takes “all things to herself to feed her emptiness”. All things. She devours the jewels that Melkor stole from Formenos, she devours her foul mates in Ered Gorgoroth, she even devours herself in the end. But light is her greatest desire, the “food” (“fix”?) she craves more than any other. I find the line “she hungered for light and hated it” very powerful. It reminds me very much of what Gandalf said of Gollum and the Ring: “He hated it and loved it, as he hated and loved himself”. I’ve always found that thought incredibly sad. Poor, wicked, tormented Sméagol, caught in this inescapable and destructive web of lust and loathing. I suppose I’m feeling more inclined to think of Ungoliant in a similar way now that we have been discussing the symbolism of light in Tolkien’s mythos. Does she hunger for light because she is drawn to all it represents: love, hope, mercy, blessedness? Does she hate it because her emptiness is all the more unbearable next to the fullness of its glory? Is Ungoliant, deep down, unknowingly, seeking some kind of redemption – to somehow touch the infinite presence of Ilúvatar so that her great emptiness can finally be filled, her anguish ended, her hunger abated. Poor, wicked, tormented Ungoliant, seeking to fill the nothingness within her with the purity and beauty of light, only to turn it into a greater nothingness, an “Unlight” that is as void as the Darkness from which she came, as empty as her very being.I've been thinking about Ungoliant for days ... thinking about her greed and her ability to devour light. Her need which, if I may say so, goes far beyond any analogy of a junkie's craving. It is a necessity. She cannot exist without consuming light and in fact, eventually, deprived of light she does starve.
And yet it is scripted.The way I look at it, the Valar are like actors in a play. They have seen the script, but they are still free to improvise. However, if they stray too far from the Director's vision, He is not above stepping into the action to steer it back on course.
Following that analogy to its natural conclusion, we are like actors in a play that have NOT seen the script. Help
I would really like to get into a discussion of a question I asked in the Istari thread on the dimensionality of evil and whether or not there is some possibility of a deeply buried flicker of remorse ... perhaps not even recognized, that still remains inside the souls, the essence, of Tolkien's dark characters.Is Ungoliant, deep down, unknowingly, seeking some kind of redemption – to somehow touch the infinite presence of Ilúvatar so that her great emptiness can finally be filled, her anguish ended...
Again, Tolkien seems to be drawing our attention to the similarities between Beleriand and Aman in the following passage:But of bliss and glad life there is little to be said, before it ends; as works fair and wonderful, while still they endure for eyes to see, are their own record, and only when they are in peril or broken for ever do they pass into song.
And like Aman, a shadow now grows in potency and malice to threaten the very fabric of its existence. One can feel that terrible power in Morgoth’s cry during his battle with Ungoliant, and how it marks the end of the days of bliss: “…but the great cry of Morgoth echoed through Beleriand, and all its people shrank for fear; for though they knew not what it foreboded, they heard then the herald of death.”In Beleriand in those days the Elves walked, and the rivers flowed, and the stars shone, and the night-flowers gave for the their scents; and the beauty of Melian was as the noon, and the beauty of Lúthien was the dawn in spring. In Beleriand King Thingol upon his throne was as the lords of the Maiar, whose power is at rest, whose joy is as untroubled from the heights to the deeps.
Middle-earth is now sundered from Aman by more than just the great Sea, and without the familiar presence of the Valar, the great events of the First Age, both glorious and tragic, are set to begin.But new tidings were at hand, which none in Middle-earth had foreseen, neither Morgoth in his pits nor Melian in Menegroth; for no news came out of Aman, whether by messenger, or by spirit, or by vision in dream, after the death of the Trees.
Thank you.Athrabeth wrote:I live to serve!![]()
The Sindar do get a raw deal, don’t they, their quiet flames obscured by the bright fires of the Noldor. And yet it was the Sindar, not the Noldor, that produced the “greatest of all the Eldar.”Of The Sindar
Tolkien stated (as I have now quoted twice already in the short history of this board), that Lúthien was “the chief matter of the legends and histories of the Elves, along with the greatest of the Noldor, Fëanor and Galadriel. But those two, Fëanor and Galadriel, were really very much alike, which perhaps helps explain their enmity (and Galadriel was of course the more wise and enduring of the two). I see Lúthien as the opposite pole to Fëanor. She is very much a paragon of goodness. I have much to say about Lúthien, but I will exercise a rare bit of patience (for me) and wait until it is the correct time.And in the midst of this earthly paradise, Lúthien is born ”and the white flowers of niphredil came forth to greet her as stars from the earth.”. To me, this image harkens back to Varda’s kindling of the stars to greet the awakening Elves. Is Lúthien’s birth another kind of awakening for the Eldar?
How nice to see that you have been following that discussion.The on-going “Shibboleth” discussion seems particularly pertinent to this section of the chapter, and as I read through it this time, I saw more clearly how the “separateness” of Elves and Dwarves is maintained through an unbridged chasm of language. Both kindreds contribute to this separateness, with the Elves unwilling to learn the language of the Dwarves and the Dwarves unwilling to share its “secrets”. Galadriel’s words to Gimli become all the more meaningful to me when viewed in relation to this fundamental gulf between the two races.
We see this echoed again in Gondolin the other great hidden kingdom of the Elves that stands the longest. But again, I get ahead of the story.I also find it interesting that the weavings of Melian of the “many things that had befallen in Arda since its beginning, and shadows of things that were yet to be”, seem to parallel the tapestries of Míriel in the halls of Vairë that record the deeds of the Noldor within Arda. Menegroth, to me, is clearly an echo in Middle-earth of the splendour of Valinor; the crowning glory of a “blessed realm” in its own right, of beauty and wisdom and peace.
But this observation is so true! It is confirmed every day, reading the newspapers or watching the news on TV.Ominously, not until “the days of the War” will the Sindar begin in earnest to record their deeds, and so the works of Melian and the artisans of Menegroth will be destroyed and their glad memories lost forever. Tolkien’s words almost sound like a gentle lament for the short-sightedness of those blessed with peace and plenty:
But of bliss and glad life there is little to be said, before it ends; as works fair and wonderful, while still they endure for eyes to see, are their own record, and only when they are in peril or broken for ever do they pass into song.
I too love this description, particularly of the beauty of Melian and Lúthien. There is yet another parallel with the Lord of the Rings, where Gimli (again!) describes Galadriel and Arwen as “Morning” and “Evening”. It is very interesting to me that Galadriel is there described in similar terms as Lúthien is described here, further corroborating the sense that Galadriel has over the ages moved toward the ideal that Lúthien represented. Whereas, Melian’s beauty being as the noon evokes the “noontide of Valinor” when bliss was at its highest peak. (And Arwen as the “Evening” of course symbolizes the fading of the Elves.)In Beleriand in those days the Elves walked, and the rivers flowed, and the stars shone, and the night-flowers gave for the their scents; and the beauty of Melian was as the noon, and the beauty of Lúthien was the dawn in spring. In Beleriand King Thingol upon his throne was as the lords of the Maiar, whose power is at rest, whose joy is as untroubled from the heights to the deeps.
I’ve found the story of the Nandor interesting, brief though it is told, particularly that of Denethor, son of Lenwë, whoThe first battle in the Wars of Beleriand does not end in a clear victory for the Elves. Many of the people of Lenwë retreat to a wary and secretive existence in the land of Ossiriand, while many others seek refuge in the guarded realm of Thingol, becoming merged with the Sindar. Círdan is driven “to the rim of the sea”, presumably back behind the “walled havens of Falas” that remain unassailable by the forces of Morgoth.
But when Morgoth returned to Middle-earth and assailed Beleriand with a great army of Orcs, Thingol called upon Denethor, and he paid for his loyalty with his life, and “his people lamented him ever after and took no king again.” Somehow that has always touched me, though I could hardly say why exactly....hearing rumour of the might of Thingol and his majesty, and of the peace of his realm, gathered such host of his scattered people as he could, and led them over the mountains into Belieriand. There they were welcomed by Thingol, as kin long lost that return, and they dwelt in Ossiriand, the Land of Seven Rivers.
All the more so, since it was “by the power of Melian” that Ungoliant’s advance into the realm of Thingol was stayed.Melian “put forth her power and fenced all that dominion round about with an unseen wall of shadow and bewilderment…that none thereafter could pass against her will or the will of King Thingol, unless one should come with a power greater than that of Melian the Maia.” (which certainly says something about Beren!).
Yet another connection to the Lord of the Rings that I had never before noted.It should be noted that in the next chapter, the Valar will hide and protect Valinor in much the same way, creating the Enchanted Isles where all the seas are ”filled with shadows and bewilderment”. In many ways, “the Girdle of Melian” also reminds me of the power of Galadriel’s will (with help from Nenya) which serves to create an impenetrable wall that shields Lothlórien against the mind and will of Sauron.
This is Tolkien at his high-minded best. The stage for the great performance that will play out upon the lands of Middle-earth is indeed well-set.The last passage, brief, but chilling, serves to bring the reader back full circle to the events at the end of the previous chapter: the journey of Fëanor across the Sea in the stolen ships of the Teleri, and his treachery against the host of Fingolfin. But it is this sentence that I find the most telling:
But new tidings were at hand, which none in Middle-earth had foreseen, neither Morgoth in his pits nor Melian in Menegroth; for no news came out of Aman, whether by messenger, or by spirit, or by vision in dream, after the death of the Trees.
Me too, Sass, though I admit to some uneasiness about the term "the dark Elves." The Moriquendi were those Elves who refused the summons of the Valar to Valinor, or fell away on the Great Journey, and never saw the light of the Two Trees. But I think its pretty well established that the summons of the Valar to Valinor was a mistake. Yet those that refused that summons are definitely second class citizens in the heirarchy of the Eldar.Sassafras wrote:The Moriquendi …. I love the sound and the feel of that word …
This is an important point, I think, and I think the dwarves are deserving of more thought then I tend to give them. We know that Elves and Men were not part of the musical theme propounded by Eru to the Ainur, that their "themes were introduced into the Music by the One, when the discords of Melkor arose." But what of the dwarves? Surely they also were not part of the original musical theme propounded by Eru, and yet they too were inserted into the tale, and given wills of their own by Eru. But unlike the intrusion that resulted in the creation of Elves and Men, which was "made indeed while the ‘story’ was still only a story and not ‘realized’" the intrusion that resulted in the creation of the dwarves happened (it now seems to me) while the story was already being realized, and that the dwarves were never part of the either the Music, nor the Vision that was revealed to the Ainur by Eru as a result of the Music.Being made by Aulë, and not directly from Ilúvatar's music, perhaps they will always be different from the two children ... always slightly apart and not quite a comfortable fit.
Tolkien found this immensely troubling as well.Here again we have the origin of orcs as elves . I still find this immensely troubling because it cuts to the heart of the problem of whether or not orcs can be considered to contain some flicker of a soul.
Yes. The light of the Two Trees is somehow seen to confer legitimacy or a special dispensation and the Moriquendi who refused the summons are the recalictrant children who shall forever be denied the grace shed by the Light.Me too, Sass, though I admit to some uneasiness about the term "the dark Elves." The Moriquendi were those Elves who refused the summons of the Valar to Valinor, or fell away on the Great Journey, and never saw the light of the Two Trees. But I think its pretty well established that the summons of the Valar to Valinor was a mistake. Yet those that refused that summons are definitely second class citizens in the hierarchy of the Eldar.
The more I think about the dwarves the more I come to the conclusion that their difficulties in communicating stems from the manner of their birth. Tolkien seems to have paid far less attention to them, mostly because, I suspect he was intent on working out the duality that Elves and Men represented to him. Elves representing the aesthetic and creative in man, and Men being of a baser nature and far more easily corruptible.the dwarves were never part of the either the Music, nor the Vision that was revealed to the Ainur by Eru as a result of the Music.