Concerning Christopher

Seeking knowledge in, of, and about Middle-earth.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Concerning Christopher

Post by Alatar »

http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2013/01 ... -his-work/

I will be back with my thoughts on the matter!
Concerning Christopher – An Essay on Tolkien’s Son’s Decision to Not Allow Further Cinematic Licensing of His Work
January 7, 2013 at 11:47 am by JPB -
Christopher Tolkien

Christopher Tolkien

Often, when a lengthy discussion of the Hobbit films takes place, someone asks “What about the other books? What about material from The Silmarillion, or Unfinished Tales? Will these be adapted to the big screen?”

The answer to this question is a simple one. As it stands, the literary executor of J.R.R. Tolkien’s work, his son, Christopher Tolkien, has refused to consider any further licensing of his father’s work for cinematic purposes.

Many fans are quite frustrated by this state of affairs. They know there is interesting material contained in these other sources, such as the well-known “Quest for Erebor.” That one short work alone would illuminate in key ways the motivations and decisions of principal characters in the films. (For the curious, the Quest for Erebor may be found in a shortened form in “Unfinished Tales”, and in a fuller form in the revised edition of Douglas Anderson’s “Annotated Hobbit.”)

None of this material is available to Peter Jackson’s production crew. Indeed, they must be quite careful to avoid any reference to these works, lest they are accused of using material that is beyond their access. One could even consider Gandalf’s scripted comment concerning the names of the two blue wizards as a nod to this ‘forbidden knowledge’ – in the film, Gandalf says their names are lost to him, when Tolkien knew the answers, and provided them in Unfinished Tales (Alatar and Pallando).

Movie buffs want to see the best possible Hobbit films, and they feel this untouchable material would have been valuable to the production. Further, they wish to one day experience part or all of The Silmarillion on the silver screen. In their eyes, this could all happen if Christopher Tolkien would just let up, and sell the rights.

Of courses, wishes aren’t horses in the world of intellectual property and copyright law. Christopher is the literary executor, and his decision stands. We have no legal right to complain.

But as fans, we don’t stop there! We want to know if Christopher is making the correct decision; we want know if it one we can or should support as the best decision; and we want to even voice an opinion as to whether we think Christopher has the ethical right to make the call (even though he, again, has full legal right.)
J.R.R Tolkien and son Christopher Tolkien

J.R.R Tolkien and son Christopher Tolkien

Let’s first ask: Is Christopher fit to be deciding the fate of his father’s work? Did his father make the right choice in naming him the executor?

Absolutely, the answer is yes. With the possible exception of Rayner Unwin, who enabled the publication of The Hobbit, and supported Tolkien’s work and maintained a friendship with him from the age of ten until his death, there has been no bigger fan of J.R.R. Tolkien’s work than his son Christopher. The son’s name is known to us primarily because he has provided many more pages of his father’s writing than anyone else. We would not have The Quest for Erebor or The Silmarillion as something we want filmed if it weren’t for Christopher’s efforts at getting these posthumous works published in the first place. He also brought us Unfinished Tales, allowed the publication of his father’s letters, gave us the twelve volume History of Middle-earth, the Children of Húrin, and so much more. It’s impossible to overstate the importance of Christopher’s contributions to the world of Tolkien. So J.R.R. Tolkien clearly chose the correct literary executor; he couldn’t have asked for a better steward of his work.

Now that we’ve established Christopher as a true fan, can we trust him to know his father’s wishes in this matter? After all, many children do not maintain closeness to their father. How about Christopher?

Tolkien’s letters show us that father and son maintained a close relationship throughout their shared Earthly existence. Christopher loved his father’s writings. As a young child, he sat with his father, who would read his writings to him. In the military, he read and reviewed chapters of the then-in-progress Lord of the Rings. He made many versions of the Middle-earth maps we love so well. We can see he loves his father’s work, and supported it. It’s extremely unlikely that he is not aware of whether or not his father wanted films to be made of his work. Christopher may not be honoring those wishes, but it’s difficult to believe that he has no inkling of his father’s wishes in this matter, as it came up during his lifetime.

That’s settled, so next, do we have any independent evidence ourselves as to what the father would have wanted done with his work?

Unfortunately, we don’t have much available to us to answer this question. In 1981′s “The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien”, in letter 202 he states “Stanley U(nwin) and I have agreed on our policy: Art or Cash. Either very profitable terms indeed; or absolute author’s veto on objectionable features or alteration.” This shows a balanced viewpoint: He loves his work, but he knows it can be a tool to provide income, and he is willing to use that tool. However, letter 207 provides a hint of regret that this trade-off must be considered. “I feel very unhappy about the extreme silliness and incompetence of Z(immerman) and his complete lack of respect for the original… But I need, and shall soon need very much indeed, money… so that I shall endeavor to restrain myself, and avoid all avoidable offence.”

We are left uncertain. Tolkien is willing to have his work filmed, but perhaps he was only willing to consider this because he desperately needed the money. So we can’t decide this for ourselves. We are left right at the beginning – still wondering if Christopher is doing the right thing. Well, let’s finally hear what he has to say! What does he have to say about the world of Tolkien?

In an interview given in Le Monde on July 9, 2012 (translated), he makes his views clear. He commented on the films themselves, but a more general quote on the legacy of commercialization is more pertinent to our inquiry:

“Tolkien has become a monster, devoured by his own popularity and absorbed into the absurdity of our time. The chasm between the beauty and seriousness of the work, and what it has become, has overwhelmed me. The commercialization has reduced the aesthetic and philosophical impact of the creation to nothing. There is only one solution for me: to turn my head away.”

He is hardly mincing words, and some, even many (including myself), would say his words go too far. In an attempt to paint a single-toned picture, create a fully consistent view, he loses any subtlety and with it, a bit of validity. I would never have discovered the world of Tolkien without that ‘monster’ crossing my path in a 1973 holiday display at a local bookstore. This website, first made for the production of the films, has places devoted to discussing Tolkien’s work, and has created a community for discussion of the books that would not have existed but for this ‘cultural monster’.

So where does this leave us? After all this, we are still right at the beginning – wondering if Christopher is doing the right thing. This is why debate on this topic has continued to rage, instead of quickly settling. Many of us want more Tolkien on film. We aren’t going to get more, because Christopher won’t let us have any, and we aren’t sure what J.R.R. Tolkien would have done. Christopher has the legal right to make the call, is a good choice to be the one making the call, knows his father’s wishes better than anyone, but can we and should we support the decision?

Let’s do a thought experiment and try to guess why Christopher might have made the decision he has made, and see if we can empathize with it, and from that, support it. To do this, we can only look at his words and actions; we don’t know his intent. His words show his concern is over popular culture “reducing the aesthetic and philosophical impact of the creation to nothing”, and his actions show he has devoted his life to exposing his father’s written word to the world.
It’s clear to us that Christopher thinks his father’s work conveys something vital. He wants us to see what’s so inspiring about those words. I believe, that to his viewpoint, based on his experience over the decades, the more that work is filtered through the imperfect lens of adaptation, and becomes fodder for the grist-mill of popular culture, the further it gets from the purity of its source material. To Christopher, that’s a shame – he must “turn his head away.” When people get their Tolkien only from the films, or plays, or role-playing games, or other adaptations, they are missing the true value of his father’s work. Christopher has devoted much of his life to combating this problem. To quote Galadriel, “Through the ages of the world we have fought the long defeat.” That’s what I think Christopher is doing – fighting what he sees as the long defeat – wherever he can, not only publishing as much of his father’s work as he can, but preventing further erosion of his father’s written word by simply not allowing further adaptations to take place. All this is speculation, but to me it’s reasonable.

Collected, Edited, Published by CJRTAt the end of the day, I do not know, but believe, that Christopher simply wants others to read what his father wrote.

By keeping much of what was written from the movie theater, if you want to read about Gandalf’s origins – you have to go to your bookshelf, you can’t fast forward to that on a DVD. If you want to find out just who Morgoth was, and why all of Middle-earth was considered his ring, you will have to go to your local library and check out some of the History of Middle-earth; you can’t skip to that chapter on Netflix. And with that bit of effort, borne out of wanting to find out more, you will transform yourself from a movie-watcher to someone who has directly discovered the true joy and depth of Tolkien’s world that only his writing can provide. Maybe there will be a day in the future when Tolkien is regularly taught in schools, so everyone knows what he has provided to us. But “it is not this day.” This day, it helps to keep having reasons to go to the books; to have some parts of Tolkien’s world beyond the reach of any adaptation at all. Christopher is uniquely empowered to force us to go to the books, and, while I want more Tolkien on film, I can empathize with his. In addition, because I love the books so much, I find myself supporting his decision. (For the most part, as I think Quest for Erebor could have been licensed.). I hope, after reading all this, that you can support his decision as well.

Both film and book have brought so many joy. I believe we should celebrate the existence of both. Thank you, Peter Jackson, for creating the films, introducing so many to Tolkien’s world. And thank you, Christopher Tolkien, for making sure all of us still have plenty of reasons to go back to the books, where a deeper joy awaits.

- JPB

========================

JPB is a computer programmer who likes Tolkien – how rare is that! He has been a fan of the Professor’s work since having a boxed set recommended to him by a clerk at a bookstore he was visiting with his mother at age 12. He wishes he could somehow thank that clerk, and also the person who put Tolkien’s artwork on the box, as his mother agreed to the purchase largely because the Elvish heraldic devices against the red background ‘looked so nice.’
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

As promised, back with my thoughts!

I suppose its safe to say that CRT has earned the right to do as he pleases with his father's work. Personally, though, I think he is unintentionally doing his father a disservice. Anything that brings more people to appreciate the books is a good thing. Christopher may feel that too many people would just accept the movies at face value and never look deeper, but how many of those people were ever likely to pick up the books? In my own personal monkeysphere, I have been reading and evangelising the books for over 30 years. In that time I know of exactly 2 of my friends who picked it up on my recommendation. However, the movies brought around a huge number of my immediate circle. Several friends and family read the books, or at least attempted them. Not all of them liked them, but they would never have picked up the books without PJ's movie.

There's also a knock on effect. Because the LotR movies were so big, everyone was going to see The Hobbit. A much larger percentage of my friends took the time to read The Hobbit last year in order to have read it before the movie came out.

And these are Tolkien's most accessible work. Even Children of Húrin, which is a complete story, seems to start and end abruptly because it was always intended to be part of a larger narrative. Where will people find out about Beren and Lúthien? If my Mum asks me about the song Aragorn was singing, would I honestly recommend wading through the Ainulindalë, the Valaquenta and 18 chapters of the F Elves so she can read a one chapter summary? Will I hand her the Lay of Leithan in Rhyming couplets? Its never going to happen.

These stories deserve to be told and they deserve to be promoted. In this task Christopher is failing miserably. In fact, he appears to be taking some sort of high moral ground that his father's works are so important that only people who go to the effort of discovering them the hard way deserve to read them.

And I think that's a shame.
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46098
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Alatar wrote:I suppose its safe to say that CRT has earned the right to do as he pleases with his father's work.
I would stop there.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

You are perfectly entitled to, but as his father's work is in the public domain now, I would disagree.
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46098
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Um, no. The Silmarillion and the other works edited by Christopher Tolkien won't be in the public domain for many decades.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

I don't mean legally. I refer to the argument that once an author publishes his works, they are in the public consciousness and he no longer controls them. I don't refer to the legal concept of "free to use" because copyright has expired. But I think you knew that.
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46098
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

"Public domain" is a pretty specific legal term, as I think you know. It seems to me that what you are really saying is that you don't believe that copyright laws should exist.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

Dear God where did you get that from????? I'll admit "public domain" may have been the wrong choice of word, but that's a stretch, even for a lawyer! Is "Public Consciousness" any better?

Either way, I'm not advocating abolishment of copyright. As I already stated:
I suppose its safe to say that CRT has earned the right to do as he pleases with his father's work.
I will further clarify that he undoubtedly has the legal rights to do as he wishes, but I assumed that was self explanatory.

However, just because one has the right to do something does not mean one should.
These stories deserve to be told and they deserve to be promoted. In this task Christopher is failing miserably. In fact, he appears to be taking some sort of high moral ground that his father's works are so important that only people who go to the effort of discovering them the hard way deserve to read them.

I'll simplify for clarity. Christopher owns the rights. I personally feel that he is not honouring his father's work in the way he has chosen to exercise those rights.

Better?
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

Alatar wrote:I'll simplify for clarity. Christopher owns the rights. I personally feel that he is not honouring his father's work in the way he has chosen to exercise those rights.

Better?
I have no strong opinion one way or the other on this. I just wanted to say that it was clear to me that this is what you meant by your original comments.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists


Image
User avatar
axordil
Pleasantly Twisted
Posts: 8999
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:35 pm
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
Contact:

Post by axordil »

I was momentarily confused by "public domain," but I am inclined to agree with Alatar's point to an extent. While CJRT has undoubted legal rights where JRRT's writing is concerned, he is its conservator, not its creator. The sense of desired control over how JRRT's legacy is perceived exudes from every page of HOME.
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46098
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

axordil wrote: While CJRT has undoubted legal rights where JRRT's writing is concerned, he is its conservator, not its creator. The sense of desired control over how JRRT's legacy is perceived exudes from every page of HOME.
In my opinion, Christopher has not only the same legal right to decide what to do with the work that his father left under his control as a living author would, he also has the same moral obligation to do so in a way that he personally feels comfortable with. Not only did his father choose to pass on that right and obligation to him, as he told Le Monde "As strange as it may seem, I grew up in the world he created," he explains. "For me, the cities of The Silmarillion are more real than Babylon."

It certainly is reasonable to say that in the same circumstance, one would do things differently, but I don't think that one should say that he should do things differently, anymore than I think that one should demand that a living author sell the film rights to their work off if they are not comfortable doing so.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10596
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

Ah I'm not saying that he should do something differently. The decision is his. I'm saying I disagree with his decision, and that I believe the decision he has made is damaging his father's legacy rather than protecting it. He has every right to make that decision, but I have every right to think its the wrong one.
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46098
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Yes, you certainly have that right!
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
axordil
Pleasantly Twisted
Posts: 8999
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:35 pm
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
Contact:

Post by axordil »

I'll be honest: the notion of passing on rights to control one's artistic creations after death leaves an unpleasant taste in my mouth. It's not an ethical or legal question for me so much as aesthetic and philosophical. A writer's chance for that level of control--what JRRT called subcreation--comes while they write. Artistically, it can no more bequeathed then their particular genius.

CJRT has all the rights in the world, but that doesn't make him his father. Not even his father could do that.
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

I'm sure the thought that Christopher would be caring for his literary legacy gave comfort to JRRT in his old age. He had already seen what Disney wanted to do to LotR. He could at least know that further rights would not be sold and that Christopher would see that future book publications were as respectful of Tolkien's intentions as possible (even though what they actually were was not always going to be clear).
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
User avatar
SirDennis
Posts: 842
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:31 am
Location: Canada

Post by SirDennis »

For a time immediately following the making of Jackson's LOTR I thought it would be nice if CT et al were more free with the licensing of their patriarch's work. Since seeing what Jackson's Hobbit has become (and/or where it seems to be headed), and given the liberties taken with license granted so far, my sympathies are now with the estate.

This isn't merely about the right to translate original works to other media... it's also about believing (or not believing) the spirit of those works will be treated with due respect by people of integrity.
Post Reply